JH-2 tournement : Round 7

[Johan Havegheer]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Johan Havegheer am 02. November 1999 19:42:20:
Hello,
JH – 2 Tournement : Round 7
1. Crafty 16.16 – Bringer 1.5 : 2 – 0
2. Gromit 2.20 – Bionic 4.01 : 1.5 – 0.5
3. Comet B05 – Anmon 4.27 : 0.5 – 1.5
4. Lgol2000 – Arasan5.2 : 1.5 – 0.5
5. Phalanx21 – Inmichess217 : 1.5 – 0.5
Standings after R7
1. Crafty 16.16 11/14
2. Gromit 2.20 10/14
3. Goliath 2000 8/14
Anmon 4.27 8/14
Bionic 4.01 8/14
6. Comet B05 7.5/14
7. Arasan 5.2 6/14
Bringer 1.5 6/14
9. Phalanx 21 4/14
10. Inmichess 2.17 1.5/14
Johan

[Andreas Herrmann]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Andreas Herrmann am 02. November 1999 20:23:31:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: JH-2 tournement : Round 7 geschrieben von:/posted by: Johan Havegheer am 02. November 1999 19:42:20:

Hello,
JH – 2 Tournement : Round 7
1. Crafty 16.16 – Bringer 1.5 : 2 – 0
2. Gromit 2.20 – Bionic 4.01 : 1.5 – 0.5
3. Comet B05 – Anmon 4.27 : 0.5 – 1.5
4. Lgol2000 – Arasan5.2 : 1.5 – 0.5
5. Phalanx21 – Inmichess217 : 1.5 – 0.5
Standings after R7
1. Crafty 16.16 11/14
2. Gromit 2.20 10/14
3. Goliath 2000 8/14
Anmon 4.27 8/14
Bionic 4.01 8/14
6. Comet B05 7.5/14
7. Arasan 5.2 6/14
Bringer 1.5 6/14
9. Phalanx 21 4/14
10. Inmichess 2.17 1.5/14
Johan

Good place for Gromit and a bad tournament for Phalanx.
Andreas

Schachpage Andreas Herrmann

[Frank Schneider]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Frank Schneider am 03. November 1999 07:06:01:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: JH-2 tournement : Round 7 geschrieben von:/posted by: Johan Havegheer am 02. November 1999 19:42:20:

Hello,
JH - 2 Tournement : Round 7
1. Crafty 16.16 - Bringer 1.5 : 2 - 0
2. Gromit 2.20 - Bionic 4.01 : 1.5 - 0.5
3. Comet B05 - Anmon 4.27 : 0.5 - 1.5
4. Lgol2000 - Arasan5.2 : 1.5 - 0.5
5. Phalanx21 - Inmichess217 : 1.5 - 0.5
Standings after R7
1. Crafty 16.16 11/14
2. Gromit 2.20 10/14
3. Goliath 2000 8/14
Anmon 4.27 8/14
Bionic 4.01 8/14
6. Comet B05 7.5/14
7. Arasan 5.2 6/14
Bringer 1.5 6/14
9. Phalanx 21 4/14
10. Inmichess 2.17 1.5/14
Johan

Hi Johan,
thanks for this tournament! Finally good performance by Gromit after
many mediocre to bad rankings in other tournaments. IMHO the reason is
the slow timecontrols you use (most other tournaments were blitz) and,
of course, luck
Best regards,
Frank


GromitChess Home Page

[Johan Havegheer]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Johan Havegheer am 03. November 1999 18:20:32:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: JH-2 tournement : Round 7 geschrieben von:/posted by: Andreas Herrmann am 02. November 1999 20:23:31:

Hello,
JH – 2 Tournement : Round 7
1. Crafty 16.16 – Bringer 1.5 : 2 – 0
2. Gromit 2.20 – Bionic 4.01 : 1.5 – 0.5
3. Comet B05 – Anmon 4.27 : 0.5 – 1.5
4. Lgol2000 – Arasan5.2 : 1.5 – 0.5
5. Phalanx21 – Inmichess217 : 1.5 – 0.5
Standings after R7
1. Crafty 16.16 11/14
2. Gromit 2.20 10/14
3. Goliath 2000 8/14
Anmon 4.27 8/14
Bionic 4.01 8/14
6. Comet B05 7.5/14
7. Arasan 5.2 6/14
Bringer 1.5 6/14
9. Phalanx 21 4/14
10. Inmichess 2.17 1.5/14
Johan

Good place for Gromit and a bad tournament for Phalanx.
Andreas

Andreas,
I always plays on slower times (40moves / 60minutes). I'm playing two games each night. so 1 round almost takes a week. Gromit is on his best at slower
times.
Phalanx has been outplayed positionally.
But there are still 2 rounds to go.
Johan

[Johan Havegheer]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Johan Havegheer am 03. November 1999 18:27:57:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: JH-2 tournement : Round 7 geschrieben von:/posted by: Frank Schneider am 03. November 1999 07:06:01:

Hello,
JH - 2 Tournement : Round 7
1. Crafty 16.16 - Bringer 1.5 : 2 - 0
2. Gromit 2.20 - Bionic 4.01 : 1.5 - 0.5
3. Comet B05 - Anmon 4.27 : 0.5 - 1.5
4. Lgol2000 - Arasan5.2 : 1.5 - 0.5
5. Phalanx21 - Inmichess217 : 1.5 - 0.5
Standings after R7
1. Crafty 16.16 11/14
2. Gromit 2.20 10/14
3. Goliath 2000 8/14
Anmon 4.27 8/14
Bionic 4.01 8/14
6. Comet B05 7.5/14
7. Arasan 5.2 6/14
Bringer 1.5 6/14
9. Phalanx 21 4/14
10. Inmichess 2.17 1.5/14
Johan

Hi Johan,
thanks for this tournament! Finally good performance by Gromit after
many mediocre to bad rankings in other tournaments. IMHO the reason is
the slow timecontrols you use (most other tournaments were blitz) and,
of course, luck
Best regards,
Frank

Thanks Frank, I always use slower timecontrols. But i think that my faster
processor also helps a lot for Gromit. I always liked your program and i am looking forward to a new and stronger version. (with analyses support please)
But there are still 2 rounds to go. Gromit could end seventh also, but he has to play Inmichess in the next round.
Johan

[Frank Schneider]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Frank Schneider am 04. November 1999 19:29:39:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: JH-2 tournement : Round 7 geschrieben von:/posted by: Johan Havegheer am 03. November 1999 18:27:57:

Hello,
JH - 2 Tournement : Round 7
1. Crafty 16.16 - Bringer 1.5 : 2 - 0
2. Gromit 2.20 - Bionic 4.01 : 1.5 - 0.5
3. Comet B05 - Anmon 4.27 : 0.5 - 1.5
4. Lgol2000 - Arasan5.2 : 1.5 - 0.5
5. Phalanx21 - Inmichess217 : 1.5 - 0.5
Standings after R7
1. Crafty 16.16 11/14
2. Gromit 2.20 10/14
3. Goliath 2000 8/14
Anmon 4.27 8/14
Bionic 4.01 8/14
6. Comet B05 7.5/14
7. Arasan 5.2 6/14
Bringer 1.5 6/14
9. Phalanx 21 4/14
10. Inmichess 2.17 1.5/14
Johan

Hi Johan,
thanks for this tournament! Finally good performance by Gromit after
many mediocre to bad rankings in other tournaments. IMHO the reason is
the slow timecontrols you use (most other tournaments were blitz) and,
of course, luck
Best regards,
Frank

Thanks Frank, I always use slower timecontrols. But i think that my faster
processor also helps a lot for Gromit.
I always liked your program and i am looking forward to a new and stronger version. (with analyses support please)
But there are still 2 rounds to go. Gromit could end seventh also, but he has to play Inmichess in the next round.
Johan

Gromit definately likes AMD-Processors. It seems that for Gromit a PII 500 is only about twice as fast as my own K6/200.
Since I'm currently short on time I can't promise anything...
Of course, however, I'm satisfied with the good results so far.
When testing before the WCCC 99 I had a version (2.16) which had some very good
testresults. Version 2.20 is slightly different and had some not so good
results, therefore I'm not sure if 2.20 is really stronger. Your tournament
(and the WCCC) indicates that it was a good decision to use 2.20 in Paderborn.

Thanks,
Frank


GromitChess Home Page