What do you think about the results of the New SDF list?

Archive of the old Parsimony forum. Some messages couldn't be restored. Limitations: Search for authors does not work, Parsimony specific formats do not work, threaded view does not work properly. Posting is disabled.

What do you think about the results of the New SDF list?

Postby Aaron » 08 Apr 2000, 12:41

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Aaron at 08 April 2000 13:41:53:
Taken from CCC

THE SSDF RATING LIST 2000-04-07 72059 games played by 206 computers
Rating + - Games Won Oppo
------ --- --- ----- --- ----
1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2721 39 -37 368 67% 2594
2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2689 31 -30 565 68% 2557
3 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2671 33 -32 486 64% 2572
4 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2654 34 -32 474 65% 2543
5 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2653 33 -32 478 65% 2545
6 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2626 35 -33 438 63% 2530
6 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2626 35 -34 432 62% 2539
8 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2624 46 -44 251 62% 2541
9 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 40 -39 318 60% 2549


SO finally Crafty gets on the list and it's weaker by less than 100 SDF points than all the other commericals except Nimzo 99..
I wonder why did they choose to test Crafty using the Chess base native engine? Is it effectively similar to The Xboard-winboard versions? I own fritz as well and I find little difference between the 2...
Aaron
 

Re: What do you think about the results of the New SDF list?

Postby Pete Galati » 08 Apr 2000, 20:13

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Pete Galati at 08 April 2000 21:13:45:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: What do you think about the results of the New SDF list? geschrieben von: / posted by: Aaron at 08 April 2000 13:41:53:
Taken from CCC

THE SSDF RATING LIST 2000-04-07 72059 games played by 206 computers
Rating + - Games Won Oppo
------ --- --- ----- --- ----
1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2721 39 -37 368 67% 2594
2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2689 31 -30 565 68% 2557
3 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2671 33 -32 486 64% 2572
4 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2654 34 -32 474 65% 2543
5 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2653 33 -32 478 65% 2545
6 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2626 35 -33 438 63% 2530
6 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2626 35 -34 432 62% 2539
8 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2624 46 -44 251 62% 2541
9 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 40 -39 318 60% 2549


SO finally Crafty gets on the list and it's weaker by less than 100 SDF points than all the other commericals except Nimzo 99..
I wonder why did they choose to test Crafty using the Chess base native engine? Is it effectively similar to The Xboard-winboard versions? I own fritz as well and I find little difference between the 2...
Something about trouble running the Winboard Crafty with auto 232. I'm just noticing that Crafty played the least amount of games of any program in that list. Nimzo must have had several unlucky games.
Pete
Pete Galati
 


Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests