AnMon-LG2000 blitz matches

[Gábor Szõts]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Gábor Szõts at 06 June 2000 07:23:13:
I have let them play one another two 30-game G/5 matches. One on a Pentium 166 with 4 MB hash, the other on a Celeron 433 with 32 MB hash. Results are interesting:
P166/4MB: AnMon 5.09 - LG2000 2.7 18-12 (14-8-8)
C433/32MB: LG2000 2.7 - AnMon 5.09 16.5 - 13.5 (15-12-3)
Draw your own conclusions.

[Kurt Utzinger]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 06 June 2000 10:28:09:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: AnMon-LG2000 blitz matches geschrieben von: / posted by: Gábor Szõts at 06 June 2000 07:23:13:
In blitz matches AnMon509 and LG2000v27 are equal. At longer time controls, especially 40/120 Little Goliath is clearly stronger.

[Gábor Szõts]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Gábor Szõts at 06 June 2000 11:06:45:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: AnMon-LG2000 blitz matches geschrieben von: / posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 06 June 2000 10:28:09:

In blitz matches AnMon509 and LG2000v27 are equal. At longer time controls, especially 40/120 Little Goliath is clearly stronger.

Right. Just this is one of the points the comparison demonstrates.

[WYx]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: WYx at 06 June 2000 17:42:45:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: AnMon-LG2000 blitz matches geschrieben von: / posted by: Gábor Szõts at 06 June 2000 11:06:45:

In blitz matches AnMon509 and LG2000v27 are equal. At longer time controls, especially 40/120 Little Goliath is clearly stronger.

Right. Just this is one of the points the comparison demonstrates.

My opinion, LG2000v27 is weaker, as AMon 5.09 in BLITZ.
LG2000v27 very agressive program.
regards
WYx