WBEC Ridderkerk new results.

[Leo Dijksman]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Leo Dijksman at 14 August 2004 16:50:49:

1st Division:
Round 15:
AnMon 5.32 ½110 2.5/4
SOS 99.11.03 ½001 1.5/4
---------------------------------
Delfi 4.5 CIPS ½½1½ 2.5/4
Movei 0.08.247 ½½0½ 1.5/4
---------------------------------
Gothmog 1.0b7 01 1.0/2 = 2 games to go!
Abrok 5.0 10 1.0/2
---------------------------------

3rd Division:
Round 15:
Esc 1.16 1½0½ 2.0/4
Alarm 0.93.1 0½1½ 2.0/4
---------------------------------
Round 16:
TheCrazyBishop 0052 1111 4.0/4 !!
Horizon 4.1b12 0000 0.0/4
---------------------------------
Queen 2.44 1011 3.0/4
Cerebro 1.26g 0100 1.0/4
---------------------------------

4th Division:
Round 3:
TRACE 1.30 111½ 3.5/4
Bodo 0.2e 000½ 0.5/4
---------------------------------
Celes 0.78 wbec7 ½110 2.5/4
Waster 0.14 ½001 1.5/4
---------------------------------
BlackBishop 0.9.7i 1½ 1.5/2 = 2 games to to!
Chiron 0.38 0½ 0.5/2
---------------------------------

6th Division Group D:
Round 9:
Matacz 0.997 - PolarChess 1.3 1-0 31
PolarChess 1.3 - Matacz 0.997 0-1 62
Mint 2.3 - Ajedrez Tactico 2.20 0-1 67
Ajedrez Tactico 2.20 - Mint 2.3 1-0 52
Murderhole 1.0.10 - Chad'sChess 1.5 1-0 29
Chad'sChess 1.5 - Murderhole 1.0.10 0-1 36
Round 10:
Qalat 0.19b - Mint 2.3 1-0 54
Mint 2.3 - Qalat 0.19b 0-1 56
Rinko 1.15 - StAndersen 1.31 1-0 122
StAndersen 1.31 - Rinko 1.15 0-1 49
RDChess 3.23 - Smash 0.9-rc1 1-0 43
Smash 0.9-rc1 - RDChess 3.23 1-0 64
PolarChess 1.3 - Zotron 4.4.6 1-0 87
--------------------------------------------------------------

Crosstables and pgn on the WBEC homepage.
Enginelist, latest updates/new engines:
14/08/2004:
Updated: Tytan v3.83
Updated: ChessMaster 10000 (The King v3.33)
Best wishes,
Leo.


WBEC Ridderkerk homepage.

[Norm Pollock]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 17:59:19:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: WBEC Ridderkerk new results. geschrieben von:/posted by: Leo Dijksman at 14 August 2004 16:50:49:

1st Division:
Round 15:
AnMon 5.32 ½110 2.5/4
SOS 99.11.03 ½001 1.5/4
---------------------------------
Delfi 4.5 CIPS ½½1½ 2.5/4
Movei 0.08.247 ½½0½ 1.5/4
---------------------------------
Gothmog 1.0b7 01 1.0/2 = 2 games to go!
Abrok 5.0 10 1.0/2
---------------------------------

3rd Division:
Round 15:
Esc 1.16 1½0½ 2.0/4
Alarm 0.93.1 0½1½ 2.0/4
---------------------------------
Round 16:
TheCrazyBishop 0052 1111 4.0/4 !!
Horizon 4.1b12 0000 0.0/4
---------------------------------
Queen 2.44 1011 3.0/4
Cerebro 1.26g 0100 1.0/4
---------------------------------

4th Division:
Round 3:
TRACE 1.30 111½ 3.5/4
Bodo 0.2e 000½ 0.5/4
---------------------------------
Celes 0.78 wbec7 ½110 2.5/4
Waster 0.14 ½001 1.5/4
---------------------------------
BlackBishop 0.9.7i 1½ 1.5/2 = 2 games to to!
Chiron 0.38 0½ 0.5/2
---------------------------------

6th Division Group D:
Round 9:
Matacz 0.997 - PolarChess 1.3 1-0 31
PolarChess 1.3 - Matacz 0.997 0-1 62
Mint 2.3 - Ajedrez Tactico 2.20 0-1 67
Ajedrez Tactico 2.20 - Mint 2.3 1-0 52
Murderhole 1.0.10 - Chad'sChess 1.5 1-0 29
Chad'sChess 1.5 - Murderhole 1.0.10 0-1 36
Round 10:
Qalat 0.19b - Mint 2.3 1-0 54
Mint 2.3 - Qalat 0.19b 0-1 56
Rinko 1.15 - StAndersen 1.31 1-0 122
StAndersen 1.31 - Rinko 1.15 0-1 49
RDChess 3.23 - Smash 0.9-rc1 1-0 43
Smash 0.9-rc1 - RDChess 3.23 1-0 64
PolarChess 1.3 - Zotron 4.4.6 1-0 87
--------------------------------------------------------------

Crosstables and pgn on the WBEC homepage.
Enginelist, latest updates/new engines:
14/08/2004:
Updated: Tytan v3.83
Updated: ChessMaster 10000 (The King v3.33)
Best wishes,
Leo.

An unusual thing about Div 1 is that the 2 engines (Zarkov & Dragon) which were relegated from the Premier Division 7th edition, are NOW in the relegation zone of Div 1, 8th edition. I'm used to seeing relegated engines no worse than mid-table in the lower division. Perhaps this is a sign that the current Div 1 is a very strong divison.

[Norm Pollock]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 18:02:17:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: WBEC Ridderkerk new results. geschrieben von:/posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 17:59:19:

My prior message was not placed properly. Here it is in a readable format:
An unusual thing about Div 1 is that the 2 engines (Zarkov & Dragon) which were relegated from the Premier Division 7th edition, are NOW in the relegation zone of Div 1, 8th edition. I'm used to seeing relegated engines no worse than mid-table in the lower division. Perhaps this is a sign that the current Div 1 is a very strong divison.

[Dan Honeycutt]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 14 August 2004 18:46:28:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: WBEC Ridderkerk new results. geschrieben von:/posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 18:02:17:

My prior message was not placed properly.

I see this from time to time that there is no word wrap. Norm do you know what you did to cause it in the first post and what you did to fix it in the second?
Dan H.

[Norm Pollock]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 19:09:25:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 14 August 2004 18:46:28:

My prior message was not placed properly.

I see this from time to time that there is no word wrap. Norm do you know what you did to cause it in the first post and what you did to fix it in the second?
Dan H.

In the 1st post I did not delete the prior post. I thought I was typing at the bottom of the prior post, but I must have been typing somewhere in the middle. I do not believe that I hit prior to typing. It still should have word-wrapped.
The 2nd post was a brand new post that I typed after first deleting the prior post.

[Norm Pollock]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 19:14:33:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 19:09:25:

In the 1st post I did not delete the prior post. I thought I was typing at the bottom of the prior post, but I must have been typing somewhere in the middle. I do not believe that I hit prior to typing. It still should have word-wrapped.

Another oddity. I wanted to type that I did not hit "enter" prior to typing. But since I enclosed "enter" between "", it did not print.

[Dan Honeycutt]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 14 August 2004 19:18:22:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 19:09:25:

My prior message was not placed properly.

I see this from time to time that there is no word wrap. Norm do you know what you did to cause it in the first post and what you did to fix it in the second?
Dan H.

In the 1st post I did not delete the prior post. I thought I was typing at the bottom of the prior post, but I must have been typing somewhere in the middle. I do not believe that I hit prior to typing. It still should have word-wrapped.
The 2nd post was a brand new post that I typed after first deleting the prior post.

Thanks Norm. When I post in the middle I hit several returns to "knock a hole" in the previous post. Doing this (as far as I know) word wrap has not been a problem.
Dan H.

[Dan Honeycutt]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 14 August 2004 19:26:44:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 19:14:33:

In the 1st post I did not delete the prior post. I thought I was typing at the bottom of the prior post, but I must have been typing somewhere in the middle. I do not believe that I hit prior to typing. It still should have word-wrapped.

Another oddity. I wanted to type that I did not hit "enter" prior to typing. But since I enclosed "enter" between "", it did not print.

Curiouser and curiouser. I just hit reply to your first post and the >'s and word wrap all looked normal.
Dan H.

[Leo Dijksman]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Leo Dijksman at 14 August 2004 19:42:10:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 14 August 2004 18:46:28:

My prior message was not placed properly.

I see this from time to time that there is no word wrap. Norm do you know what you did to cause it in the first post and what you did to fix it in the second?
Dan H.

Hi Dan, Norm,
It just happen because the text was typed between the <pre> and </pre> tags which are used to format the tables in my post.
Best wishes,
Leo.


WBEC Ridderkerk homepage.

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 14 August 2004 19:44:40:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Norm Pollock at 14 August 2004 19:14:33:

Another oddity. I wanted to type that I did not hit "enter" prior to typing. But since I enclosed "enter" between "", it did not print.

That's normal because those will be treated as html tags then
Regards,
Günther

[Volker Pittlik]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Volker Pittlik at 15 August 2004 22:31:12:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 14 August 2004 19:26:44:


...

Curiouser and curiouser. I just hit reply to your first post and the >'s and word wrap all looked normal.

The ">" has nothing to do with the wrapping this is caused by the "pre" tag as Leo wrote and can also be caused by the "pcode" tag if it was used.
">" and "

[Dan Honeycutt]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Dan Honeycutt at 16 August 2004 01:09:46:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: OT word wrap geschrieben von:/posted by: Volker Pittlik at 15 August 2004 22:31:12:

...

Curiouser and curiouser. I just hit reply to your first post and the >'s and word wrap all looked normal.

The ">" has nothing to do with the wrapping this is caused by the "pre" tag as Leo wrote and can also be caused by the "pcode" tag if it was used.
">" and "<" are treated different by the forum software.
To get a WYSIWYG GUI I can turn HTML totally off, but that will have other (and I think much more) disadvantages. Please take a look at http://www.pittlik.de/wbforum/formatted.html#form to get some hints.
Volker

Mystery solved. Thanks Volker and Leo.
Dan H.