Man vs Machine

Discussions about Winboard/Xboard. News about engines or programs to use with these GUIs (e.g. tournament managers or adapters) belong in this sub forum.

Moderator: Andres Valverde

Man vs Machine

Postby Anonymous » 01 Dec 2005, 21:44

In the documentary Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine Kasparov was accusing the IBM Deep Blue team of cheating. He was especially suspicious about game 2 and, as I understand, the move 37. Be4. I thought that you might be interested to know that in the following position of the second game of 1997 match Kasparov vs Deep Blue

[diag]r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1[/diag]
r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1 w - - 0 1

after a day of thinking Crafty 18.13.rj16 (a modified Crafty chess engine, my current Crafty version is 20.1.rj2) running on 1 CPU 2.6 GHz Windows XP machine has played 37. Be4, the same move Deep Blue played.

Code: Select all
depth=24 1/37 +0.37 37. Be4 Rcb8 38. Kh2 Rxa2 39. Qxa2 Qd8 40. Qa6 Kh7 41. g3 Rb6 42. Qa7 Kg8 43. Qa8 Qxa8 44. Rxa8+ Kf7 45. Ra7+ Kf8 46. Kg1 Bb8 47. Rd7 Bd6 48. Kf2 Ra6 49. Ke3 h5; Time: 24:17:06.52

I guess that Deep Blue could have come to the depth of 24 plies much faster than Crafty running on the mentioned hardware (possibly within a time limit of one move in tournament time controls) and it looks after all that computers can play this kind of move.

I would be interested to know what would other chess engines do in this position. If you intend to run the test and post back the results could you please specify: chess engine, machine speed and OS, time of thinking, ply reached and move made. Thanks.
Anonymous
 

Re: Man vs Machine

Postby Uri Blass » 01 Dec 2005, 21:56

Robert Jurjevic wrote:In the documentary Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine Kasparov was accusing the IBM Deep Blue team of cheating. He was especially suspicious about game 2 and, as I understand, the move 37. Be4. I thought that you might be interested to know that in the following position of the second game of 1997 match Kasparov vs Deep Blue

[diag]r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1[/diag]
r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1 w - - 0 1

after a day of thinking Crafty 18.13.rj16 (a modified Crafty chess engine, my current Crafty version is 20.1.rj2) running on 1 CPU 2.6 GHz Windows XP machine has played 37. Be4, the same move Deep Blue played.

Code: Select all
depth=24 1/37 +0.37 37. Be4 Rcb8 38. Kh2 Rxa2 39. Qxa2 Qd8 40. Qa6 Kh7 41. g3 Rb6 42. Qa7 Kg8 43. Qa8 Qxa8 44. Rxa8+ Kf7 45. Ra7+ Kf8 46. Kg1 Bb8 47. Rd7 Bd6 48. Kf2 Ra6 49. Ke3 h5; Time: 24:17:06.52

I guess that Deep Blue could have come to the depth of 24 plies much faster than Crafty running on the mentioned hardware (possibly within a time limit of one move in tournament time controls) and it looks after all that computers can play this kind of move.

I would be interested to know what would other chess engines do in this position. If you intend to run the test and post back the results could you please specify: chess engine, machine speed and OS, time of thinking, ply reached and move made. Thanks.


It is known that deep blue did not use null move pruning and used a lot of extensions that reduced it's nominal depth.

There are logfiles that can prove that it only could get depth 12 at tournament time control and it had a branching factor of more than 3 so there is no reason to believe that it could get depth 24 in less than
3*3^12 minutes and it means that it could not get depth 24 even in one year.

Note that I do not claim that deep blue depth is equivalent to Crafty's depth but I think that it is pointless to try to compare between a dead thing(deep blue) and another program that you use today.

Uri
User avatar
Uri Blass
 
Posts: 727
Joined: 09 Oct 2004, 05:59
Location: Tel-Aviv

Re: Man vs Machine

Postby MartinB » 02 Dec 2005, 12:09

Hi Robert,

not much of a problem for Shredder 9.1 on P4 with 2.8GHz

Code: Select all
 17/45    01:48    36.793.080    408.104  +0,41    1.Ta2a6 e5e4
 17/45+   01:57    40.007.401    403.605  +0,42    1.Lc2e4

 [...]

 22/56   16:52    417.751.126   420.325   +0,61   1.Lc2e4 Tc8b8 2.Ta2a6 De8d8 3.Kg1f1 Ta8xa6



Cheers,

Martin
MartinB
 
Posts: 12
Joined: 01 Oct 2004, 11:20

Re: Man vs Machine

Postby Bryan Hofmann » 03 Dec 2005, 17:22

On a P4 3.0Ghz (64bit)


Crafty-Cito 1.4.3:
7 00:00 132.888 1.661.100 +0.39 1. Ra5 Rxa5 2. Rxa5 Bc7 3. Ra7 Bb8 4. Ra6 e4
7 00:00 177.313 1.970.144 +0.52 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Rd8 3. Ra5 Bxb4 4. cxb4 Rxd5
7 00:00 190.483 1.731.663 +0.52 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Rd8 3. Ra5 Bxb4 4. cxb4 Rxd5
8 00:00 268.632 1.678.950 +0.79 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Qd7 3. Ra7 Rc7 4. Rxc7 Bxc7 5. Qe6+ Qf7 6. Be4
8 00:00 289.233 1.701.370 +0.79 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Qd7 3. Ra7 Rc7 4. Rxc7 Bxc7 5. Qe6+ Qf7 6. Be4
9 00:00 428.918 1.715.672 +0.82 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Qd7 3. Ra6 Rd8 4. Ra7 Qe8 5. Ra5 <HT>
9 00:00 455.061 1.685.411 +0.82 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Qd7 3. Ra6 Rd8 4. Ra7 Qe8 5. Ra5 <HT>
10 00:01 919.302 1.671.458 +1.22 1. Qb6!!
10 00:01 1.252.688 1.670.250 +1.24 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Rc6 Bb8 6. Be4 Ba7+ 7. Kh2
10 00:01 1.308.526 1.677.597 +1.24 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Rc6 Bb8 6. Be4 Ba7+ 7. Kh2
11 00:01 2.043.674 1.675.142 +1.13 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Be4 Qe7 6. Qc6 Qd7 7. Qe6
11 00:02 2.251.535 1.655.540 +1.13 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Be4 Qe7 6. Qc6 Qd7 7. Qe6
12 00:03 3.766.023 1.651.764 +1.17 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Rc6 Bb8 6. Be4 Ba7+ 7. Kh2 Bd4 8. cxd4 exd4
12 00:03 4.018.035 1.660.345 +1.17 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Rc6 Bb8 6. Be4 Ba7+ 7. Kh2 Bd4 8. cxd4 exd4
13 00:05 8.350.160 1.422.514 +1.12 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Rc6 Bb8 6. Be4 Ba7+ 7. Kh2 Be3 8. d6 Qd7
13 00:07 11.208.544 1.470.937 +1.12 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Bc7 3. Qe6+ Kf8 4. Ra6 Rd8 5. Rc6 Bb8 6. Be4 Ba7+ 7. Kh2 Be3 8. d6 Qd7
14 00:11 18.514.500 1.559.772 +1.15 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qe6+ Kh7 8. d6 e4 9. d7 e3 10. Kg3
14 00:15 23.523.611 1.568.240 +1.15 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qe6+ Kh7 8. d6 e4 9. d7 e3 10. Kg3
15 00:20 32.512.405 1.625.620 +0.87 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qb8+ Kh7 8. Qxb5 Qb3 9. d6 Qxc3 10. d7 Qd4
15 00:43 68.263.320 1.587.519 +0.87 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qb8+ Kh7 8. Qxb5 Qb3 9. d6 Qxc3 10. d7 Qd4
16 01:12 115.505.697 1.604.245 +1.13 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qb8+ Kh7 8. Qxb5 Qd3 9. d6 Qxd6 10. Qxc4 g6
16 01:16 122.699.863 1.614.471 +1.13 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qb8+ Kh7 8. Qxb5 Qd3 9. d6 Qxd6 10. Qxc4 g6
17 01:47 174.239.702 1.628.408 +0.60 1. Qb6 Rxa2 2. Rxa2 Ra8 3. Rxa8 Qxa8 4. Qxd6 Qa1+ 5. Kh2 Qc1 6. Bd1 Qxd1 7. Qb8+ Kh7 8. Qxb5 Qd3 9. d6 Qxd6 10. Qxc4 e4+ 11. g3 e3
17 08:16 791.885.234 1.596.542 +0.76 1. Be4 Rcb8 2. Kh2 Rxa2 3. Qxa2 Bc7 4. Qf2 Bd6 5. Ra6 Qd8 6. Qa7 <HT>
17 09:26 901.692.213 1.593.095 +0.76 1. Be4 Rcb8 2. Kh2 Rxa2 3. Qxa2 Bc7 4. Qf2 Bd6 5. Ra6 Qd8 6. Qa7 <HT>
18 11:35 1.111.143.577 1.598.767 +0.76 1. Be4 Rcb8 2. Kh2 Rxa2 3. Qxa2 Bc7 4. Qf2 Qd8 5. Qc5 Kh7 6. Kh1 Bd6 7. Qa7 Qc8 8. Qf7 Qf8 9. Qh5 Re8 10. Ra7
Bryan Hofmann
 
Posts: 98
Joined: 02 Oct 2004, 20:26
Location: USA


Return to Winboard and related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests