Comparison Scidlet 3.6 and Scidlet 3.61DC?

Discussions about Winboard/Xboard. News about engines or programs to use with these GUIs (e.g. tournament managers or adapters) belong in this sub forum.

Moderator: Andres Valverde

Comparison Scidlet 3.6 and Scidlet 3.61DC?

Postby Guenther Simon » 26 Feb 2005, 10:52

I wonder why the version 3.61 (IID) by Dann Corbit has
relatively weak results in RWBC compared to version 3.6?
(only 15 games so far I know, but being in danger of
demoting from Class C is not what I ever had expected...)

Has anyone more games for both to compare?

Guenther
User avatar
Guenther Simon
 
Posts: 794
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 19:49
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Comparison Scidlet 3.6 and Scidlet 3.61DC?

Postby Igor Gorelikov » 28 Feb 2005, 10:35

I have data to compare but for the following Scidlets:

Code: Select all
Change  Place Program                     Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws
in places                                    

-1   157 Scidlet 3.4.beta5              : 2054  103 102    37    54.1 %   2026   21.6 %
+4   190 Scidlet 3.6.1                  : 1953  100  99    45    51.1 %   1946    8.9 %


Time control: 60'+3"
Celeron 1GHz 256MB; hash settings is up to 38MB in sum for each engine;
resign is set to 6; 3-men, 4-men, and few 5-men Nalimov's TBs.
Galis WBTM 0.5.0 and Winboard 4.2.7 are used to arrange the event.

Igor
User avatar
Igor Gorelikov
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 27 Sep 2004, 10:12
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: Comparison Scidlet 3.6 and Scidlet 3.61DC?

Postby Dann Corbit » 28 Feb 2005, 23:28

If I remember right, there was a drop off in strength between 3.6 and 3.61 that was reported by many testers.

I do not know what caused this difference.
Dann Corbit
 


Return to Winboard and related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests