Winboard Forum

[diag]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1[/diag]

Regards

Volker

yes

Richard Pijl wrote:yes

The wonders of chmod.

Volker

Me too, Reinhard

Also ich kann?s auch sehen! (aber nur mit Brille )

Allerdings dieses ?18+23+1? verstehe ich genausowenig wie Du!?
M?glicherweise sollten da die Figurenanzahlen f?r Wei?+Schwarz stehen -
so ist es jedenfalls bei Schachproblem-Aufgaben ?blich (also hier 16+16).

Gru?,
Franz.

F.Huber wrote:...
Allerdings dieses ?18+23+1? verstehe ich genausowenig wie Du!?
M?glicherweise sollten da die Figurenanzahlen f?r Wei?+Schwarz stehen -
so ist es jedenfalls bei Schachproblem-Aufgaben ?blich (also hier 16+16).
...

Dachte ich auch zuerst, ist aber offensichtlich flasch. Immerhin sind solche r?tselhaften Zahlen auch bei http://www.rebnora.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=164 zu finden. Ist vielleicht irgendwas mit dem Script. Aber ich kann damit leben.

Volker

Volker Pittlik wrote:Dachte ich auch zuerst, ist aber offensichtlich flasch. Immerhin sind solche r?tselhaften Zahlen auch bei http://www.rebnora.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=164 zu finden. Ist vielleicht irgendwas mit dem Script. Aber ich kann damit leben.

Volker

Hey hey, sieh Dir mal das Diagramm in Deinem Link genauer an -
dieses ?16+2? ist doch f?r diese Stellung korrekt!

Franz.

F.Huber wrote:...
Hey hey, sieh Dir mal das Diagramm in Deinem Link genauer an -
dieses ?16+2? ist doch f?r diese Stellung korrekt!

Franz.

Mischt ops: ! Egal, hab den Scriptautor angemailt.

Volker

To cut and paste the occasional test position into my engine. Or, am I missing something

David Weller wrote:To cut and paste the occasional test position into my engine. Or, am I missing something

[diag]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR[/diag]

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1

The diagram script is a bit "abused" here because it is written to handle positions of a chess variant. It only handles the piece placement part of the FEN string as expected. I simply paste the string twice. Once inside the diagram once after it.

Regards

Volker

Thanks Volker,

I also noticed that if I right-click the image and select properties, I can get to the fen string. [using mozilla]

BTW the subject line is kinda small in posts - I think. yes/no?

David Weller wrote:Thanks Volker,

I also noticed that if I right-click the image and select properties, I can get to the fen string. [using mozilla]

BTW the subject line is kinda small in posts - I think. yes/no?

Thanks for the hint. Yes I agree the subject line is to small. I'm working on a theme of the subSilver style. I'll choose the colors of the old WB forum. I'll also have a look if I can find how to change the size of the subject line. This may need some days.

Regards

Volker

I see only one diagram
(Posted: Wed 06 Oct 2004 11:02).

I do not see a diagram in the first message (posted: Sun 03 Oct 2004 23:25). Instead of it I see the following:
Expected a piece, got an integer (neutral=1, rotation=0, line is RNBQKBNRwKQkq-01)

Niyaz Khasanov wrote:I see only one diagram
(Posted: Wed 06 Oct 2004 11:02).

I do not see a diagram in the first message (posted: Sun 03 Oct 2004 23:25). Instead of it I see the following:
Expected a piece, got an integer (neutral=1, rotation=0, line is RNBQKBNRwKQkq-01)

Interesting, let's make a test. Do you see this one:
[diag]r3r1k1/ppp1bppp/2n5/3q1b2/3P4/P1P2N2/4BPPP/R1BQR1K1 w - - 0 15[/diag]

r3r1k1/ppp1bppp/2n5/3q1b2/3P4/P1P2N2/4BPPP/R1BQR1K1 w - - 0 15

And whats about this one?


[diag]r3r1k1/ppp1bppp/2n5/3q1b2/3P4/P1P2N2/4BPPP/R1BQR1K1[/diag]

r3r1k1/ppp1bppp/2n5/3q1b2/3P4/P1P2N2/4BPPP/R1BQR1K1

Regards

Volker

yes

G?bor Szots wrote:yes

You see both?

Volker

Instead of the first new diagram I see the following sentence:
Twice neutral in a row?

The second new diagram is OK.

Niyaz Khasanov wrote:Instead of the first new diagram I see the following sentence:
Twice neutral in a row?

The second new diagram is OK.

Thank you. It seems that the diagram is not displayed properly when the whole FEN string is used (r3kb1r/p4ppp/2p1b3/3n3P/8/1P2qP2/PB1NQ1P1/2KR1B1R b kq - 0 17).

I suggest to use the piece placement part (r3kb1r/p4ppp/2p1b3/3n3P/8/1P2qP2/PB1NQ1P1/2KR1B1R) only. I'm going to write a readme and will include this information.

Regards

Volker

I suppose it is sufficient to get rid of two last integers.
If I am right, the following diagram will look OK:

[diag]r3kb1r/p4ppp/2p1b3/3n3P/8/1P2qP2/PB1NQ1P1/2KR1B1R b kq -[/diag]

r3kb1r/p4ppp/2p1b3/3n3P/8/1P2qP2/PB1NQ1P1/2KR1B1R b kq -

Yes, I see the last diagram.
So we need to write FEN without last two integers.