Winboard Forum

[diag]8/8/8/8/3k4/4R3/2K5/8[/diag]
8/8/8/8/3k4/4R3/2K5/8 w - - 0 1
Mate in 13

Code: Select all

 19   +327.38   29.9M   0:16.92   1. Re2 Kc4 2. Rd2 Kb5 3. Kd3 Kc5 4.
 19   +327.38   36.2M   0:20.48   1. Re2 Kc4 2. Rd2 Kb5 3. Kd3 Kc5 4. Kc3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Kc4 Kc6 7. Rd1 <HT>
 20   +327.36   52.9M   0:29.70   1. Re2 Kc5 2. Kc3 Kd5 3. Re3 Kc5 4. Rd3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Rd2 Kb5 7. Kd5 <HT>
 20   +327.36   76.8M   0:42.70   1. Re2 Kc5 2. Kc3 Kd5 3. Re3 Kc5 4. Rd3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Rd2 Kb5 7. Kd5 <HT>

Mate score went down?!?!

Pradu wrote:Mate in 13

Code: Select all

 19   +327.38   29.9M   0:16.92   1. Re2 Kc4 2. Rd2 Kb5 3. Kd3 Kc5 4.
 19   +327.38   36.2M   0:20.48   1. Re2 Kc4 2. Rd2 Kb5 3. Kd3 Kc5 4. Kc3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Kc4 Kc6 7. Rd1 <HT>
 20   +327.36   52.9M   0:29.70   1. Re2 Kc5 2. Kc3 Kd5 3. Re3 Kc5 4. Rd3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Rd2 Kb5 7. Kd5 <HT>
 20   +327.36   76.8M   0:42.70   1. Re2 Kc5 2. Kc3 Kd5 3. Re3 Kc5 4. Rd3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Rd2 Kb5 7. Kd5 <HT>

Mate score went down?!?!

Hi Pradu,

Was this with or without tablebases?

Regards,
Guenther

Guenther Simon wrote:

Pradu wrote:Mate in 13

Code: Select all

 19   +327.38   29.9M   0:16.92   1. Re2 Kc4 2. Rd2 Kb5 3. Kd3 Kc5 4.
 19   +327.38   36.2M   0:20.48   1. Re2 Kc4 2. Rd2 Kb5 3. Kd3 Kc5 4. Kc3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Kc4 Kc6 7. Rd1 <HT>
 20   +327.36   52.9M   0:29.70   1. Re2 Kc5 2. Kc3 Kd5 3. Re3 Kc5 4. Rd3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Rd2 Kb5 7. Kd5 <HT>
 20   +327.36   76.8M   0:42.70   1. Re2 Kc5 2. Kc3 Kd5 3. Re3 Kc5 4. Rd3 Kb5 5. Kd4 Kb6 6. Rd2 Kb5 7. Kd5 <HT>

Mate score went down?!?!

Hi Pradu,

Was this with or without tablebases?

Regards,
Guenther

Without tablebases.