New (for RWBC OpenClass) engines test + bug notes

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 16:46:15:

Stability test with 2min/40moves
Hash 128MB max 160MB.
Ponder off
Table after 13 from 25 rounds!
Hanging problem once and for all solved.
(sending not only kill but a forced kill now
to DelphiMax and SilkeChess, kill is also needed
for Ayito, SmallC and may be even Amundsen)
-TRex crashed once
-GES lost several games on time (hopefully solved in newest 1.21)
-Naum lost 1 on time (move 78)
-SmallC lost 1 on time (lost connection to WB?)
-JSBam lost 2 on time
-Ayito lost 3 on time
-Amundsen lost 3 on time (all in dead lost position)
-NanoSzachy 1 wrong claim (actually wrong syntax in the claim)
-Firefly 1 wrong draw claim (actually the problem is not that
it claimed too early when the opponent was to move next, but
there were 3 identical positions! with different move right.)
=============================================================================
Game 166: Ayito_0240-NanoSzachy_12
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nd7 5. Nf3 Ngf6 6. Nxf6+ Nxf6 7. Ne5
Qd5 8. f3 c5 9. Be3 cxd4 10. Bxd4 Nd7 11. Bc3 Qxd1+ 12. Rxd1 Nxe5 13. Bxe5
Bd7 14. Bd4 Ba4 15. b3 Bc6 16. c3 a6 17. Kf2 O-O-O 18. Bd3 h5 19. Rhe1 Rh6
20. a4 h4 21. Re2 Rh5 22. Kf1 h3 23. g4 Rg5 24. Be3 Rgd5 25. Red2 Bc5 26.
Bf2 Bxf2 27. Kxf2 g6 28. Kg3 R5d7 29. Kf2 f5 30. gxf5 exf5 31. Ke3 Kb8 32.
Kf4 g5+ 33. Ke3 f4+ 34. Kf2 b6 35. Ke2 Re8+ 36. Kf2 Re3 37. Be2 Rxd2 38.
Rxd2 Rxc3 39. Rd8+ Ka7 40. Rg8 Rxb3 41. Rxg5 Ra3 42. Bd1 Ra2+ 43. Be2 Rxa4
44. Rg7+ Bb7 45. Bd3 Ra2+ 46. Kf1 Ra1+ 47. Ke2 Rh1 48. Be4 Rxh2+ 49. Kd3
a5 50. Kc4 Ra2 51. Rxb7+ Ka6 52. Rh7 h2 53. Rh8 Ra4+ 54. Kd5 Ra2 55. Kc6
Ka7 56. Kc7 Rc2+ 57. Bxc2 h1=Q 58. Rxh1 a4 59. Bd3 b5 60. Ra1 Ka8 61. Bxb5
Ka7 62. Rxa4#
Result :0-1 {black checkmated}
Warning level :4
Final position: 8/k1K5/8/1B6/R4p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 62
Analyze result:1-0 {white mates}
=============================================================================
Game 76: Surprise_416-Firefly_111
1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bb5 Ne4 7. Bxc6+
bxc6 8. Bd2 Nxc3 9. Bxc3 Qd5 10. O-O Bg4 11. Re1 Bxf3 12. gxf3 O-O-O 13.
Re5 Qc4 14. Qd2 Rd5 15. b3 Qb5 16. Qf4 f6 17. a4 Qb7 18. Qf5+ Kb8 19. Rxd5
cxd5 20. Qe6 g6 21. Re1 c6 22. Qf7 Kc7 23. Re6 Kb8 24. Qe8+ Qc8 25. Qxc8+
Kxc8 26. Rxc6+ Kb7 27. Re6 h5 28. Bb4 Rh7 29. Bc5 g5 30. b4 Rf7 31. b5 Ka8
32. Kg2 h4 33. h3 Kb8 34. Kg1 Ka8 35. Kg2 Kb8 36. Kg1 Ka8 37. Kh2 Kb8 38.
Kg2 Ka8 39. Kh2 Kb8 40. Kg2 Ka8
Result :1/2-1/2 {3 fold repetition}
Warning level :3
Final position: k4b2/p3pr2/4Rp2/1PBp4/P2P3p/5P1P/2P2P1K/8 w - - 16 41
Analyze result:1/2-1/2 {three repetition after next move 41. Kh2}
=============================================================================
RWBC_New_Test 2004
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 Pseudo_06d +1 -1 +1 +1 -0 +1 -1 +0 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 11.0/13
25 8 14 2 17 9 3 4 5 11 15 6 16
2 Spike_07 +1 -1 +1 -0 +1 +1 -1 +1 -1 +½ -1 +0 -1 10.5/13
26 25 8 1 14 17 9 3 4 5 11 15 6
3 Petir_102 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -0 +0 -0 +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 10.0/13
22 19 24 26 25 8 1 2 17 9 14 4 5
4 Glaurung_013 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 +0 -1 +0 -0 +1 10.0/13
23 22 19 24 26 25 8 1 2 17 9 3 14
5 Tornado_08017b +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -½ +0 -½ +1 -1 +0 10.0/13
20 23 22 19 24 26 25 8 1 2 17 9 3
6 Kiwi_01b +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -½ +1 -1 +1 -1 +0 -0 +0 9.5/13
18 13 10 20 23 22 19 24 26 25 8 1 2
7 Nesik_064 +1 -1 +1 -1 +0 -1 +1 -1 +0 -1 +1 -½ +0 9.5/13
12 21 18 13 10 20 23 22 19 24 26 25 8
8 Naum_12 +1 +0 -0 +1 -0 +1 -0 +½ -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 8.5/13
14 1 2 17 9 3 4 5 11 15 6 16 7
9 Gosu_03 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 +1 +0 -1 +0 -0 8.0/13
19 24 26 25 8 1 2 17 14 3 4 5 11
10 Surprise_416 -½ +1 -0 +½ -1 +1 -½ +1 -0 -0 +0 -1 +1 7.5/13
11 15 6 16 7 12 21 18 13 14 20 23 22
11 DelphiMax_29 +½ -0 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 +0 -0 +0 -0 +1 7.5/13
10 20 23 22 19 24 26 25 8 1 2 17 9
12 Firefly_111 -0 -0 +1 -0 +1 -0 +1 -½ +0 -1 +1 -1 +1 7.5/13
7 14 21 18 13 10 20 23 22 19 24 26 25
13 Ayito_0240 -1 +0 -1 +0 -0 +0 -½ -0 +1 -1 +0 -1 +1 6.5/13
15 6 16 7 12 21 18 14 10 20 23 22 19
14 Natwarlal_007 -0 +1 -0 +½ -0 +1 -½ +1 -0 +1 -0 +1 -0 6.0/13
8 12 1 21 2 18 17 13 9 10 3 20 4
15 GES_120 +0 -0 +0 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 +1 6.0/13
13 10 20 23 22 19 24 26 25 8 1 2 17
16 Marvin_110 +1 -0 +0 -½ +1 -1 +0 -0 +1 -1 +½ -0 +0 6.0/13
21 18 13 10 20 23 22 19 24 26 25 8 1
17 Muse_0898 +1 -1 +1 -0 +1 -0 +½ +0 -0 +0 -0 +1 -0 5.5/13
24 26 25 8 1 2 14 9 3 4 5 11 15
18 Ajetac_260 -0 +1 -0 +1 -½ -0 +½ -0 +½ -1 +1 -0 +0 5.5/13
6 16 7 12 21 14 13 10 20 23 22 19 24
19 NanoSzachy_12 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +1 -0 +1 -1 +0 -1 +1 -0 5.0/13
9 3 4 5 11 15 6 16 7 12 21 18 13
20 JanWillem_107 -0 +1 -1 +0 -0 +0 -0 +1 -½ +0 -1 -0 +½ 5.0/13
5 11 15 6 16 7 12 21 18 13 10 14 23
21 SmallC_903 -0 +0 -0 -½ +½ -1 +½ -0 +0 -½ +0 -½ +0 3.5/13
16 7 12 14 18 13 10 20 23 22 19 24 26
22 JSBam_028 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +½ -1 +0 -1 +½ -0 +0 -0 3.0/13
3 4 5 11 15 6 16 7 12 21 18 13 10
23 Murderhole_110 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +½ -1 +0 -1 +0 -½ 3.0/13
4 5 11 15 6 16 7 12 21 18 13 10 20
24 SilkeChess_121209 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -1 +0 -0 +0 -0 +½ -1 2.5/13
17 9 3 4 5 11 15 6 16 7 12 21 18
25 Amundsen_035DC -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -½ +½ -0 1.0/13
1 2 17 9 3 4 5 11 15 6 16 7 12
26 TRex_185 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -0 +0 -1 1.0/13
2 17 9 3 4 5 11 15 6 16 7 12 21

[Sven Schüle]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Sven Schüle at 01 October 2004 17:48:43:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: New (for RWBC OpenClass) engines test + bug notes geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 16:46:15:

-Firefly 1 wrong draw claim (actually the problem is not that
it claimed too early when the opponent was to move next, but
there were 3 identical positions! with different move right.)

Game 76: Surprise_416-Firefly_111
1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bb5 Ne4 7. Bxc6+
bxc6 8. Bd2 Nxc3 9. Bxc3 Qd5 10. O-O Bg4 11. Re1 Bxf3 12. gxf3 O-O-O 13.
Re5 Qc4 14. Qd2 Rd5 15. b3 Qb5 16. Qf4 f6 17. a4 Qb7 18. Qf5+ Kb8 19. Rxd5
cxd5 20. Qe6 g6 21. Re1 c6 22. Qf7 Kc7 23. Re6 Kb8 24. Qe8+ Qc8 25. Qxc8+
Kxc8 26. Rxc6+ Kb7 27. Re6 h5 28. Bb4 Rh7 29. Bc5 g5 30. b4 Rf7 31. b5 Ka8
32. Kg2 h4 33. h3 Kb8 34. Kg1 Ka8 35. Kg2 Kb8 36. Kg1 Ka8 37. Kh2 Kb8 38.
Kg2 Ka8 39. Kh2 Kb8 40. Kg2 Ka8
Result :1/2-1/2 {3 fold repetition}
Warning level :3
Final position: k4b2/p3pr2/4Rp2/1PBp4/P2P3p/5P1P/2P2P1K/8 w - - 16 41
Analyze result:1/2-1/2 {three repetition after next move 41. Kh2}

Thanks, Günther, for starting this test tourney, and for showing again that Surprise has less stability problems than problems playing good chess (I know, it's 40/2, but sometimes a few seconds are enough to see who's good and who's not.)
Being one pawn and two developed pieces ahead, Surprise did not find any other plan than repeating king moves, what a shame. Instead of 34. Kg1, Surprise should have tried any queenside plan, e.g. creating a passed pawn on b. The very clever ones would simply walk with their king from g2 to a6, and after winning Pa7, they would mate in a few plies. But how to find this, how to know that Black's pieces are really "dead"?
I suspect that the better engines would recognize it. So perhaps Surprise won't go further than OpenClass yet, provided it qualifies.
But be prepared, one day ...
Cheers,
Sven


Surprise

[Andrew Fan]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Andrew Fan at 01 October 2004 18:17:21:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: New (for RWBC OpenClass) engines test + bug notes geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 16:46:15:

So my engines are as ill as I am. Pity.
Beta versions of KKFChess2.6.7b and FireFly1.1.2b (with 3-fold bug fixed, among others) is available for limited period (as long at I am online) at the address below.

Mostly bug fixes, no time for real improvements.
Grab them while you can!

Have fun.



http://andrewfan.homedns.org/Betas

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 18:26:26:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: KKF & FF beta available geschrieben von:/posted by: Andrew Fan at 01 October 2004 18:17:21:

So my engines are as ill as I am. Pity.
Beta versions of KKFChess2.6.7b and FireFly1.1.2b (with 3-fold bug fixed, among others) is available for limited period (as long at I am online) at the address below.

Mostly bug fixes, no time for real improvements.
Grab them while you can!

Have fun.

I hope you will recover soon! Your virus seems much worse than mine,
because I am already (nearly) well again.
Got them
Best wishes,
Günther

[Piotr Cichy]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Piotr Cichy at 01 October 2004 18:36:59:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: New (for RWBC OpenClass) engines test + bug notes geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 16:46:15:

Stability test with 2min/40moves
[...]
-NanoSzachy 1 wrong claim (actually wrong syntax in the claim)
[...]
Game 166: Ayito_0240-NanoSzachy_12
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nd7 5. Nf3 Ngf6 6. Nxf6+ Nxf6 7. Ne5
Qd5 8. f3 c5 9. Be3 cxd4 10. Bxd4 Nd7 11. Bc3 Qxd1+ 12. Rxd1 Nxe5 13. Bxe5
Bd7 14. Bd4 Ba4 15. b3 Bc6 16. c3 a6 17. Kf2 O-O-O 18. Bd3 h5 19. Rhe1 Rh6
20. a4 h4 21. Re2 Rh5 22. Kf1 h3 23. g4 Rg5 24. Be3 Rgd5 25. Red2 Bc5 26.
Bf2 Bxf2 27. Kxf2 g6 28. Kg3 R5d7 29. Kf2 f5 30. gxf5 exf5 31. Ke3 Kb8 32.
Kf4 g5+ 33. Ke3 f4+ 34. Kf2 b6 35. Ke2 Re8+ 36. Kf2 Re3 37. Be2 Rxd2 38.
Rxd2 Rxc3 39. Rd8+ Ka7 40. Rg8 Rxb3 41. Rxg5 Ra3 42. Bd1 Ra2+ 43. Be2 Rxa4
44. Rg7+ Bb7 45. Bd3 Ra2+ 46. Kf1 Ra1+ 47. Ke2 Rh1 48. Be4 Rxh2+ 49. Kd3
a5 50. Kc4 Ra2 51. Rxb7+ Ka6 52. Rh7 h2 53. Rh8 Ra4+ 54. Kd5 Ra2 55. Kc6
Ka7 56. Kc7 Rc2+ 57. Bxc2 h1=Q 58. Rxh1 a4 59. Bd3 b5 60. Ra1 Ka8 61. Bxb5
Ka7 62. Rxa4#
Result :0-1 {black checkmated}
Warning level :4
Final position: 8/k1K5/8/1B6/R4p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 62
Analyze result:1-0 {white mates}

Is it a wrong claim of NanoSzachy?
It seems to me it is a wrong claim of Ayito.

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 18:47:12:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: New (for RWBC OpenClass) engines test + bug notes geschrieben von:/posted by: Sven Schüle at 01 October 2004 17:48:43:

Thanks, Günther, for starting this test tourney, and for showing again that Surprise has less stability problems than problems playing good chess (I know, it's 40/2, but sometimes a few seconds are enough to see who's good and who's not.)
Being one pawn and two developed pieces ahead, Surprise did not find any other plan than repeating king moves, what a shame. Instead of 34. Kg1, Surprise should have tried any queenside plan, e.g. creating a passed pawn on b. The very clever ones would simply walk with their king from g2 to a6, and after winning Pa7, they would mate in a few plies. But how to find this, how to know that Black's pieces are really "dead"?
I suspect that the better engines would recognize it. So perhaps Surprise won't go further than OpenClass yet, provided it qualifies.
But be prepared, one day ...
Cheers,
Sven

May be Surprise was just in time trouble and would have played
right for the win after the 40th move cut?
I agree even for a 2/40 it looks goofy for us Humans, but well
we would often look goofy too in tactics at that speed
IMHO Surprise already had made some jump in strength with that version
and I am not sure anymore, if it must qualify at all.
Going further than the OpenClass is currently not very realistic,
because of too much good new programs and just 9-10 promotion spots.
First goal should be not to demote from the OpenClass, as all below
place 42 must leave.

Greets from Regensburg,
Günther

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 01 October 2004 19:00:05:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: New (for RWBC OpenClass) engines test + bug notes geschrieben von:/posted by: Piotr Cichy at 01 October 2004 18:36:59:

Stability test with 2min/40moves
[...]
[...]
Game 166: Ayito_0240-NanoSzachy_12
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nd7 5. Nf3 Ngf6 6. Nxf6+ Nxf6 7. Ne5
Qd5 8. f3 c5 9. Be3 cxd4 10. Bxd4 Nd7 11. Bc3 Qxd1+ 12. Rxd1 Nxe5 13. Bxe5
Bd7 14. Bd4 Ba4 15. b3 Bc6 16. c3 a6 17. Kf2 O-O-O 18. Bd3 h5 19. Rhe1 Rh6
20. a4 h4 21. Re2 Rh5 22. Kf1 h3 23. g4 Rg5 24. Be3 Rgd5 25. Red2 Bc5 26.
Bf2 Bxf2 27. Kxf2 g6 28. Kg3 R5d7 29. Kf2 f5 30. gxf5 exf5 31. Ke3 Kb8 32.
Kf4 g5+ 33. Ke3 f4+ 34. Kf2 b6 35. Ke2 Re8+ 36. Kf2 Re3 37. Be2 Rxd2 38.
Rxd2 Rxc3 39. Rd8+ Ka7 40. Rg8 Rxb3 41. Rxg5 Ra3 42. Bd1 Ra2+ 43. Be2 Rxa4
44. Rg7+ Bb7 45. Bd3 Ra2+ 46. Kf1 Ra1+ 47. Ke2 Rh1 48. Be4 Rxh2+ 49. Kd3
a5 50. Kc4 Ra2 51. Rxb7+ Ka6 52. Rh7 h2 53. Rh8 Ra4+ 54. Kd5 Ra2 55. Kc6
Ka7 56. Kc7 Rc2+ 57. Bxc2 h1=Q 58. Rxh1 a4 59. Bd3 b5 60. Ra1 Ka8 61. Bxb5
Ka7 62. Rxa4#
Result :0-1 {black checkmated}
Warning level :4
Final position: 8/k1K5/8/1B6/R4p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 62
Analyze result:1-0 {white mates}

Is it a wrong claim of NanoSzachy?
It seems to me it is a wrong claim of Ayito.

-Ayito 1 wrong mate claim (for the false side)

Hi Piotr, sorry for the confusion, I should have looked
for the debug first! You are right, in fact Ayito sent that
wrong mate claim.
378474 <first : 0-1 {black checkmated}
GameEnds(32, black checkmated, 1)
Interrupting first
378474 >first : result 0-1 {black checkmated}
Interrupting second
378474 >second: result 0-1 {black checkmated}
378474 >first : force
378474 >first : ping 2
378474 >second: force
Exiting: Match Ayito_0240 vs. NanoSzachy_12: final score 0-1-0
All ok with NanoSzachy
Regards,
Günther