Progress in back-porting xboard

Discussions about Winboard/Xboard. News about engines or programs to use with these GUIs (e.g. tournament managers or adapters) belong in this sub forum.

Moderator: Andres Valverde

Progress in back-porting xboard

Postby H.G.Muller » 05 Aug 2008, 11:00

Zach Wegner and I made great progress on back-porting WinBoard 4.3.14 to Linux. We now have a version that compiles with the new back-end files, and thus basically supports all features of WinBoard 4.3.14 that are not directly related to the human interface.

At the moment, the options can only be controlled through command-line arguments, as the menus of xboard still need to be adapted. I added xboard command-line options for most of the features that I added. This means the adjudication options, time-odds mode, node-count-based timing and all variants can be used under xboard, albeit in a cumbersome way.

We are now preparing the release of version 4.3.14, which will come as a WinBoard executable package, and xboard executable package, and a joint WinBoard/xboard source package.

A screenshot, mailed to me by Zach:

Image
User avatar
H.G.Muller
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: 16 Nov 2005, 12:02
Location: Diemen, NL

Re: Progress in back-porting xboard

Postby Volker Pittlik » 05 Aug 2008, 13:21

H.G.Muller wrote:Zach Wegner and I made great progress on back-porting WinBoard 4.3.14 to Linux. ...


This are great news! Count on me as a tester! Is the "original" xboard team somehow involved?


Volker
User avatar
Volker Pittlik
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: 24 Sep 2004, 10:14
Location: Murten / Morat, Switzerland

Re: Progress in back-porting xboard

Postby H.G.Muller » 05 Aug 2008, 14:53

The people from the GNU-Savannah xboard project are not involved. I had some brief contact with Daniel Mehrmann, who was kind enough to leak the confidential WB protocol version 3 proposal to me, under the condition that I would not make it public. As I guess that implementing it could be construed as 'making public', I asked his explicit approval to implement the one feature in there that was on my own wish-list as well: the engine comments for inclusion in the debug file. We agreed that it would be a good thing if I implemented this exactly as in the proposal (using '#' to comment out the output).

I had some brief contact with Tim, about clarification of some ambiguities in the WB protocol definition, but he was desinterested to the point where he considered my one-page e-mail too long to read...

Considering the 'recent' developments listed on the official project site, I really don't expect much support from there. If progress is to be made, we are entirely on our own. But we are doing fine! My own work is entirely based on Allessandro Scotti's WinBoard_x sources, at the time he already stopped developing, so all of WinBoard_x is included in the 4.3.xx series.
User avatar
H.G.Muller
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: 16 Nov 2005, 12:02
Location: Diemen, NL


Return to Winboard and related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests