Yannik Snoeckx wrote:EugeneCarey wrote:Run these old GNU Chess programs, along with John Stanback's and a few other classics, along with a few reference programs, and see what kind of performance those old things can do.
Hello !
I've played some games with Gnu 3.1 and here are the results, mixed in my Dinosaur League, although the Gnu 3.1 ones were played with another computer.
Gnu 3.1 did crash around 10 times out of 128 games, so its results could be even better, but I found it's strenght quite stunning for a 1991 free engine. (Jim I can send you the games if you want, but honestly I should test with my chess dedicated computer first ... the fault could be there ...)
There were so many versions of GNU Chess 3.1 that it's hard to figure out which was 'best'.
I heard that the final version (3.21+ I think...) was supposed to be stronger than GNU Chess 4.0 was when it was released.
I assume that the later patches to GC4 improved things, though.
4m+2s, 32 set positions ...
- Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
22 Crafty 16.19 2492 13 13 2240 62% 2400 24%
63 CrazyBishop 0045 2367 14 14 2048 53% 2341 22%
73 Phalanx 21 2341 17 17 1344 51% 2333 16%
98 ZChess 1.2 2257 14 13 2112 45% 2297 21%
103 GnuChess 4.077 2240 13 13 2304 48% 2254 20%
118 InmiChess 3.01 2174 18 18 1216 49% 2182 18%
125 Lambchop 6.90 2143 16 16 1600 42% 2210 15%
132 ExChess 2.51 2096 14 14 1984 44% 2147 21%
140 GnuChess 3.1 2035 54 55 128 42% 2100 15%
145 LaDameBlanche 2.0c 1991 21 21 960 33% 2128 16%
147 Faile 1.4.4 1958 31 31 384 35% 2067 23%
Best wishes.
YS
Thanks for the results.
Not too bad results and the number of games are tolerable.