Moderator: Andres Valverde
'Sorry. This version has timed out...'
Guenther Simon wrote:
A pity it was a time limited compilation and does't work now anymore after 3 months.'Sorry. This version has timed out...'
Guenther
Graham Banks wrote:Roughly how strong is EvilKnight III?
Olivier Deville wrote:Graham Banks wrote:Roughly how strong is EvilKnight III?
Hi Graham
Around 1000 Elo maybe.
Olivier
Olivier Deville wrote:The time limitation has been taken out, feel free to download the engine again
Olivier
Guenther Simon wrote:Olivier Deville wrote:The time limitation has been taken out, feel free to download the engine again
Olivier
That is fine Olivier. It is bad idea though that it is renamed to another version implying
it would be different and newer. The author already tricked Leo, who announced it as
a new version... May be someone can tell the author how bad the idea is?
Guenther
Ron Murawski wrote:Guenther Simon wrote:Olivier Deville wrote:The time limitation has been taken out, feel free to download the engine again
Olivier
That is fine Olivier. It is bad idea though that it is renamed to another version implying
it would be different and newer. The author already tricked Leo, who announced it as
a new version... May be someone can tell the author how bad the idea is?
Guenther
I announced it as a new version on my forum before Leo listed it. I decided to call it a new version based on searching through the previous and current executables for strings and finding:
last version:
"EvilKnight III - Jan 4 2009 - 16:27:07"
"id name EvilKnight III - Jan 4 2009 - 16:27:07"
"EvilKnight III - Jan 4 2009 - 16:27:07 (32 Bit) by Ulf Bierkaemper"
current version:
"EvilKnight III - Apr 12 2009 - 13:19:11"
"id name EvilKnight III - Apr 12 2009 - 13:19:11"
"EvilKnight III - Apr 12 2009 - 13:19:11 (32 Bit) by Ulf Bierkaemper"
It seems that the author has automated the version number to be the compile date and time. There's nothing wrong with that. I don't think the purpose was to trick us. He removed the time limitation code and, when compiled, the version number was automatically updated. I'm still calling it a new version.
Ron
Guenther Simon wrote:
Of course it was not really the prupose to 'trick' someone. But the effect of the different number/timestamp versioning is the same,
at least for all testers, who now must care how to combine two identically playing programs.
Patrick Buchmann wrote:I'll never test any other program by this autor.
Regards,
Patrick
Graham Banks wrote:
Never say never Patrick.
bierkaemper wrote:Hi guys,
first, sorry for that time limitation, sorry for the automated versioning, sorry for not indicating the timeout, sorry for that some people now never more want to have something to do with me. Sorry, that I'm born.
I asked some friends in my german board to make some simple tests, if that engine runs on there machines. Nothing more. If thousands of people play around with ek3, nice, thanks for watching.
But I never asked the world to test ek3 for me. So what? Delete it if you want, it's ok. But please, don't make a mock of me.
But thanks a lot to the people who gave some fair comments. That's worth the trouble.
Regards,
Ulf B. (The "author" of EK3)
bierkaemper wrote:Hi guys,
first, sorry for that time limitation, sorry for the automated versioning, sorry for not indicating the timeout, sorry for that some people now never more want to have something to do with me. Sorry, that I'm born.
I asked some friends in my german board to make some simple tests, if that engine runs on there machines. Nothing more. If thousands of people play around with ek3, nice, thanks for watching.
But I never asked the world to test ek3 for me. So what? Delete it if you want, it's ok. But please, don't make a mock of me.
But thanks a lot to the people who gave some fair comments. That's worth the trouble.
Regards,
Ulf B. (The "author" of EK3)
Return to Winboard and related Topics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests