H.G.Muller wrote:Using 4 low-end laptops of $300 might actually get you more games of equal quality at much lower cost than a single quad-core machine would, as laptops use very little power.
I would seriously doubt that. While laptops generally have low power components, I doubt their power supplies are as efficient as decent desktop ones. The cooling systems on laptops generally aren't designed for 24/7 use either. Really, breaking it down, each laptop consumes the power for motherboard, cpu, ram, harddrive, a display, etc, all for one or two cores.
OTOH, if you build custom quadcores, you can make them very low power and very low cost. One 45nm quad-core chip will use much less power than 2 dual-core chips (assuming the laptops are dual core, you can't buy single core Core 2 cpus anyways). In addition, you can only use the minimum needed to run: mobo, cpu, ram, and instead of a hard drive, a usb stick. No graphics card either. All of this, including the case, is just a bit over $300.
In addition, if you use quad cores, they are much more efficient when you link them together to build a distributed search.