Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Discussions about Winboard/Xboard. News about engines or programs to use with these GUIs (e.g. tournament managers or adapters) belong in this sub forum.

Moderator: Andres Valverde

Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Ron Murawski » 04 Feb 2007, 22:07

I've edited and rewitten Aaron Tay's original guide. I'm requesting additions, corrections, and arguments for differences of opinion. Any reasonable addition/correction will be added to the guide. Just so you know: all comments enclosed in square brackets are my own. Blame me and no one else for those opinions! ;)

http://computer-chess.org/pmwiki.php?n= ... ournaments

This is just the first article in what will become the new home of the Winboard FAQ. BTW, the Winboard FAQ is not ready yet. There is still much work to be done. Are there any Winboarder writers/proofreaders/suggestors out there who want to help in this project? All contributors will receive full credit for their work.

For Tony Thomas: Here's the current Private Engine List
http://computer-chess.org/pmwiki.php?n= ... EngineList
Did I miss any Tony?

Ron
User avatar
Ron Murawski
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 21:50
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Marc Lacrosse » 04 Feb 2007, 23:01

Nice job Ron!
Please do continue on the same way!

Thanks a lot.

Marc
Marc Lacrosse
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 09:04
Location: Belgium

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Tony Thomas » 05 Feb 2007, 14:10

Wow, I did not realize that there were so many private engines, it sure adds up dont it? There is an engine named Dirty 0.1 which is a combined efford from Pradu(buzz) and Andres (Eveann).
Tony Thomas
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 14 May 2006, 19:13
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Volker Pittlik » 05 Feb 2007, 14:59

Marc Lacrosse wrote:Nice job Ron!
Please do continue on the same way!

Thanks a lot.

Marc


Yes it looks very good. However, if I compare the private engine list with the list of engines freely available (and having all the other nice developements in mind) I really ask me how long I'll be interested in computer chess.

Volker
User avatar
Volker Pittlik
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: 24 Sep 2004, 10:14
Location: Murten / Morat, Switzerland

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Ron Murawski » 05 Feb 2007, 19:51

Tony Thomas wrote:Wow, I did not realize that there were so many private engines, it sure adds up dont it? There is an engine named Dirty 0.1 which is a combined efford from Pradu(buzz) and Andres (Eveann).


Added!
User avatar
Ron Murawski
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 21:50
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Tony Thomas » 05 Feb 2007, 21:45

Ron Murawski wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:Wow, I did not realize that there were so many private engines, it sure adds up dont it? There is an engine named Dirty 0.1 which is a combined efford from Pradu(buzz) and Andres (Eveann).


Added!


You are fast Ron, when are you going to release the official 4.4?
Tony Thomas
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 14 May 2006, 19:13
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Ron Murawski » 05 Feb 2007, 23:34

Tony Thomas wrote:
Ron Murawski wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:Wow, I did not realize that there were so many private engines, it sure adds up dont it? There is an engine named Dirty 0.1 which is a combined efford from Pradu(buzz) and Andres (Eveann).


Added!


You are fast Ron, when are you going to release the official 4.4?


I'll release it when I'm convinced I've made enough progress. Another 10 points will do it. I'm at a point where I'm trying idea after idea and each one of them is either failing miserably or having no effect on results. Although my internal version is 4.3.170 I'm uncertain of any true progress since 4.3.144. That's 26 straight unfruitful changes!

Ron
User avatar
Ron Murawski
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 21:50
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Michael Sherwin » 06 Feb 2007, 07:06

Ron Murawski wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:
Ron Murawski wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:Wow, I did not realize that there were so many private engines, it sure adds up dont it? There is an engine named Dirty 0.1 which is a combined efford from Pradu(buzz) and Andres (Eveann).


Added!


You are fast Ron, when are you going to release the official 4.4?


I'll release it when I'm convinced I've made enough progress. Another 10 points will do it. I'm at a point where I'm trying idea after idea and each one of them is either failing miserably or having no effect on results. Although my internal version is 4.3.170 I'm uncertain of any true progress since 4.3.144. That's 26 straight unfruitful changes!

Ron


Hi Ron,

26 unfruitful changes in a row! Is that all? Would you like to start keeping score! :D

Mike
User avatar
Michael Sherwin
 
Posts: 168
Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 06:10
Location: USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Peter Fendrich » 06 Feb 2007, 08:28

Volker Pittlik wrote:Yes it looks very good. However, if I compare the private engine list with the list of engines freely available (and having all the other nice developements in mind) I really ask me how long I'll be interested in computer chess.

Volker
ok, ok, ok... I will make Alaric public this weekend.
One less! Maybe it can make you continue one day more. :)

/Peter
User avatar
Peter Fendrich
 
Posts: 193
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 20:28
Location: Sweden

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Tony Thomas » 06 Feb 2007, 08:34

Peter Fendrich wrote:
Volker Pittlik wrote:Yes it looks very good. However, if I compare the private engine list with the list of engines freely available (and having all the other nice developements in mind) I really ask me how long I'll be interested in computer chess.

Volker
ok, ok, ok... I will make Alaric public this weekend.
One less! Maybe it can make you continue one day more. :)

/Peter


Now, that's news. Alaric will become a favorite among blitz lovers rather quick, there arent many others who can do the tango with Crafty. :mrgreen:

To Ron, may be you should Remove Eugen...El Chinito, a newer engine from the same author turned out to be a crafty clone.
Tony Thomas
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 14 May 2006, 19:13
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Tony Thomas » 06 Feb 2007, 08:34

Peter Fendrich wrote:
Volker Pittlik wrote:Yes it looks very good. However, if I compare the private engine list with the list of engines freely available (and having all the other nice developements in mind) I really ask me how long I'll be interested in computer chess.

Volker
ok, ok, ok... I will make Alaric public this weekend.
One less! Maybe it can make you continue one day more. :)

/Peter


Now, that's news. Alaric will become a favorite among blitz lovers rather quick, there arent many others who can do the tango with Crafty. :mrgreen:

To Ron, may be you should Remove Eugen...El Chinito, a newer engine from the same author turned out to be a crafty clone.
Tony Thomas
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 14 May 2006, 19:13
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Zach Wegner » 06 Feb 2007, 10:09

Ron Murawski wrote:For Tony Thomas: Here's the current Private Engine List
http://computer-chess.org/pmwiki.php?n= ... EngineList
Did I miss any Tony?

Just ol' ZCT... :D
User avatar
Zach Wegner
 
Posts: 182
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 22:02
Location: Austin, Texas, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Guenther Simon » 06 Feb 2007, 10:55

Ron Murawski wrote:I've edited and rewitten Aaron Tay's original guide. I'm requesting additions, corrections, and arguments for differences of opinion. Any reasonable addition/correction will be added to the guide. Just so you know: all comments enclosed in square brackets are my own. Blame me and no one else for those opinions! ;)

http://computer-chess.org/pmwiki.php?n= ... ournaments

This is just the first article in what will become the new home of the Winboard FAQ. BTW, the Winboard FAQ is not ready yet. There is still much work to be done. Are there any Winboarder writers/proofreaders/suggestors out there who want to help in this project? All contributors will receive full credit for their work.

For Tony Thomas: Here's the current Private Engine List
http://computer-chess.org/pmwiki.php?n= ... EngineList
Did I miss any Tony?

Ron


Why Tony? ;-) You should have asked the WB experts...

CTD
Jake
Imp
ETChess
Rinko
Nullmover

are missing for example

I guess you also have to add Anaconda, Bodo and The Baron,
because you also added Ikarus, which wasn't private
in the past, but is nowadays as all others mentioned above.

If I would think it over I could probably come up with
several more.

Regards,
Guenther
User avatar
Guenther Simon
 
Posts: 794
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 19:49
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Ron Murawski » 06 Feb 2007, 15:35

Tony Thomas wrote:
Peter Fendrich wrote:
Volker Pittlik wrote:Yes it looks very good. However, if I compare the private engine list with the list of engines freely available (and having all the other nice developements in mind) I really ask me how long I'll be interested in computer chess.

Volker
ok, ok, ok... I will make Alaric public this weekend.
One less! Maybe it can make you continue one day more. :)

/Peter


Now, that's news. Alaric will become a favorite among blitz lovers rather quick, there arent many others who can do the tango with Crafty. :mrgreen:

To Ron, may be you should Remove Eugen...El Chinito, a newer engine from the same author turned out to be a crafty clone.


Eugen has been removed from the Private Engines List. Alaric will be removed this weekend.

Ron
User avatar
Ron Murawski
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 21:50
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Ron Murawski » 06 Feb 2007, 15:39

Michael Sherwin wrote:
Ron Murawski wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:
You are fast Ron, when are you going to release the official 4.4?


I'll release it when I'm convinced I've made enough progress. Another 10 points will do it. I'm at a point where I'm trying idea after idea and each one of them is either failing miserably or having no effect on results. Although my internal version is 4.3.170 I'm uncertain of any true progress since 4.3.144. That's 26 straight unfruitful changes!

Ron


Hi Ron,

26 unfruitful changes in a row! Is that all? Would you like to start keeping score! :D

Mike


I don't mind programming the changes. I've got lots more ideas than I can possibly code. It's waiting for all those test games to prove my ideas wrong that hurts.

Ron
User avatar
Ron Murawski
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 21:50
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Ron Murawski » 06 Feb 2007, 15:52

Guenther Simon wrote:
Ron Murawski wrote:For Tony Thomas: Here's the current Private Engine List
http://computer-chess.org/pmwiki.php?n= ... EngineList
Did I miss any Tony?

Ron


Why Tony? ;-) You should have asked the WB experts...

CTD
Jake
Imp
ETChess
Rinko
Nullmover

are missing for example

I guess you also have to add Anaconda, Bodo and The Baron,
because you also added Ikarus, which wasn't private
in the past, but is nowadays as all others mentioned above.

If I would think it over I could probably come up with
several more.

Regards,
Guenther


Why Tony? ...because he's the one who started me on this Private Engines List! I took over the Winboard FAQ and discovered through Tony that the Private Engine List was always part of the old site. I felt I needed an updated list for the new site.

Thanks for the additional engines, Guenther. Do you have information as to author and country?

I'm not going to add The Baron because Richard said he would do delayed public releases. Did he change his mind?

Ron
User avatar
Ron Murawski
 
Posts: 352
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 21:50
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Guenther Simon » 06 Feb 2007, 17:22

Ron Murawski wrote:Why Tony? ...because he's the one who started me on this Private Engines List! I took over the Winboard FAQ and discovered through Tony that the Private Engine List was always part of the old site. I felt I needed an updated list for the new site.

Thanks for the additional engines, Guenther. Do you have information as to author and country?

I'm not going to add The Baron because Richard said he would do delayed public releases. Did he change his mind?

Ron


Hi Ron,

Here is some more info:

Code: Select all
Jake      NL  Mark Netjes
ETChess   FR  Eric Triki
Rinko     IT  Marco Grella
CTD       NL  Richard Pijl
Imp       LT  Aivaras Juzvikas
Nullmover NL  Michael Langeveld
Stobor    US  Tom Kerrigan


What about the other (older)engines from Mridul,
'Borer' and 'Fencer' will you list them too?

Regards,
Guenther
User avatar
Guenther Simon
 
Posts: 794
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 19:49
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Olivier Deville » 06 Feb 2007, 18:37

Guenther Simon wrote:
Ron Murawski wrote:Why Tony? ...because he's the one who started me on this Private Engines List! I took over the Winboard FAQ and discovered through Tony that the Private Engine List was always part of the old site. I felt I needed an updated list for the new site.

Thanks for the additional engines, Guenther. Do you have information as to author and country?

I'm not going to add The Baron because Richard said he would do delayed public releases. Did he change his mind?

Ron


Hi Ron,

Here is some more info:

Code: Select all
Jake      NL  Mark Netjes
ETChess   FR  Eric Triki
Rinko     IT  Marco Grella
CTD       NL  Richard Pijl
Imp       LT  Aivaras Juzvikas
Nullmover NL  Michael Langeveld
Stobor    US  Tom Kerrigan


What about the other (older)engines from Mridul,
'Borer' and 'Fencer' will you list them too?

Regards,
Guenther


Hi all

Small mistake by Guenther, ETChess is freely available.

I'll add some more engines to the list when I have time.

Olivier
User avatar
Olivier Deville
 
Posts: 1176
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 19:54
Location: Aurec, France

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Tony Thomas » 06 Feb 2007, 19:04

What's the point of listing an older program from a programer when a newer version is available? Do you ever think that they would care to dig up the old source code for us? Mridul said that he no longer even have the code of Ceng, he had told Leo that he would be sending him a new version, but that was a while back.
Tony Thomas
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 14 May 2006, 19:13
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Beginner's Guide to Running Computer Chess Tournaments

Postby Guenther Simon » 06 Feb 2007, 20:10

Tony Thomas wrote:What's the point of listing an older program from a programer when a newer version is available?


available? ;-))

It's just about the rules for listing.
For really private programs we neither know if the programmer
still has the source, nor when he touched it the last time.

Tony Thomas wrote:Do you ever think that they would care to dig up the old source code for us? Mridul said that he no longer even have the code of Ceng, he had told Leo that he would be sending him a new version, but that was a while back.


So what? What do you think is the reason for this list at all?
Why do you think anyone of them will dig out the source
for 'us'? A list is just a list or what do you think ;-)
Either it has some rules or not...
I could have also listed private programs I know they
are clones. Actually I don't understand your problem?

Guenther
Last edited by Guenther Simon on 06 Feb 2007, 20:13, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Guenther Simon
 
Posts: 794
Joined: 26 Sep 2004, 19:49
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Next

Return to Winboard and related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests