No, that is my opinion too. A think that some of the gambit lines has been removed, but I might be mistaken.Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Gambit lines? Which lines? from which book the recent one ? CometB20 and B21 seems to do espically well against Crafty, it seems to me though and not all is due to book..No, that is my opinion too. A think that some of the gambit lines has been >removed, but I might be mistaken.Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Best wishes...
Mogens
I was thinking about the old Axx and early Bxx books. I haven't found a lot of gambits or risky openings in the last games I've played with Comet. Comet does well at blitz, no doubt about it.Gambit lines? Which lines? from which book the recent one ? CometB20 and B21 seems to do espically well against Crafty, it seems to me though and not all is due to book..No, that is my opinion too. A think that some of the gambit lines has been >removed, but I might be mistaken.Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Best wishes...
Mogens
Just a suggestion here, try adding a second Winboard shortcut to your desk top, and instead of what I have for a normal shortcut:Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Just a suggestion here, try adding a second Winboard shortcut to your desk >top, and instead of what I have for a normal shortcut:Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
D:\winboard\winboard.exe /debug
what I have for the second is this:
D:\winboard\winboard.exe /mg 4
this will have Winboard play a match that is in this case 4 games long, and >that would switch Comet & Crafty back in forth on sides of the board with each >game, and if you have Winboard automatically saving each game to a pgn file
(see Options/save game) you get a record of your match.
You can set things up for your match in your Winboard started up with the >original shortcut.
All of the gambits are still im the book, however with far decreased weights. Recently, in a tourney I had to observe Comet playing the Cochrane against a strong computer. I do not want to see this happen too often.No, that is my opinion too. A think that some of the gambit lines has been removed, but I might be mistaken.Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Best wishes...
Mogens
I think that the two engines are so close that it would take millions of games to see which is the stronger at the quick games. By that time, both Crafty and Comet would be moved on to new versions and nobody would care.All of the gambits are still im the book, however with far decreased weights. Recently, in a tourney I had to observe Comet playing the Cochrane against a strong computer. I do not want to see this happen too often.No, that is my opinion too. A think that some of the gambit lines has been removed, but I might be mistaken.Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Best wishes...
Mogens
BTW, according to my statistics, crafty is clearly superior.
Thanks for your interest!I think that the two engines are so close that it would take millions of games to see which is the stronger at the quick games. By that time, both Crafty and Comet would be moved on to new versions and nobody would care.All of the gambits are still im the book, however with far decreased weights. Recently, in a tourney I had to observe Comet playing the Cochrane against a strong computer. I do not want to see this happen too often.No, that is my opinion too. A think that some of the gambit lines has been removed, but I might be mistaken.Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
Best wishes...
Mogens
BTW, according to my statistics, crafty is clearly superior.
BTW, thanks for all your excellent research with Comet. I enjoy its excellent play. For me, I like best the programs which I can investigate the source code because, well -- I'm nosy. But of the ones where you can't see the source, Comet is one of my favorites.
Well, the old GnuChess 4.x program was pretty icky, all right. Don't remember 3 very well at all, except the one that had a Windows GUI.Well, regarding the source, it is a terrible mess. In principle, there is still some similarity with the old gnu sources (version 3.1 (?)), surely with a lot of modifications and additions but nothing really exciting. For these reasons, it is probably not worthwhile diving into this.
I could tell that you did it manually because all of the games have Comet on the White side of the board, also, because the pgn files do not label which game in the match each one wasJust a suggestion here, try adding a second Winboard shortcut to your desk >top, and instead of what I have for a normal shortcut:Disclaimer
1)It is only Blitz 5 mins
2)Ponder off and we know how crafty is weaken by it
3)Number of games insufficient
Still I'm impressed by How quick cometb21 wins in some games..IS it me or is Comet's book a lot better now...
D:\winboard\winboard.exe /debug
what I have for the second is this:
D:\winboard\winboard.exe /mg 4
this will have Winboard play a match that is in this case 4 games long, and >that would switch Comet & Crafty back in forth on sides of the board with each >game, and if you have Winboard automatically saving each game to a pgn file
(see Options/save game) you get a record of your match.
You can set things up for your match in your Winboard started up with the >original shortcut.
You can tell i'm doing it manually? So all i do is i create a shortcut them type the above? what does /mg 4 do? and /debug?
I could tell that you did it manually because all of the games have Comet on >the White side of the board, also, because the pgn files do not label which >game in the match each one was /debug just makes a debug file of the last >Winboard game played, and it constantly overwrites it with every game, it'll >be in an ascii text file called winboard.debug. This isn't generally needed, >my appologies for showing that part because it was probably only confusing >things. Sorry.You can tell i'm doing it manually? So all i do is i create a shortcut them >>type the above? what does /mg 4 do? and /debug?
With /mg 4, the /mg means match game, and the 4 means that the match will be 4 >games long.
So you could change that to /mg 6 and the match would be 6 games long, I >change the number often depending on how much time I'm willing to give up the >use of my computer for. I just click on the shortcut once to highlight it, >then hit Alt-Enter to get at the properties to be able to easily change that.
You probably can not use what I have above because the path information will >not be correct for where your Winboard is located.
Pete
The cochrane is a opening gambit? Never heard of it..All of the gambits are still im the book, however with far decreased weights. >Recently, in a tourney I had to observe Comet playing the Cochrane against a >strong computer. I do not want to see this happen too often.
BTW, according to my statistics, crafty is clearly superior.
The reuse command is default, so your only experimentational option is to turn it offI may be a little slow with computers, but even I'm smart enough to try it out while changing the path to my directory..But thanks a lot , I always wanted to try the reuse function as well, how different is it from /mg ?
No problem. I don't really have anything really invested in my results anyway..I'm just trying to build a _weak_ book for Crafty. Time control is game in 5. I'm using Comet_B21 as opponent. Results so far:
No. Name Win Draw Loss Unf. Score Games %
------------------------------------------------------------
1 Crafty1710_weak +54 =15 -14 *0 61.5 83 74.1%
2 Comet_B21 +14 =15 -54 *0 21.5 83 25.9%
Total Games: 83
White Wins: 40 (48.2%)
Black Wins: 28 (33.7%)
Draws: 15 (18.1%)
Unfinished: 0 (0.0%)
System is 2*520 MHz, Ponder on, all 3, 4 and some 5 men tablebases.
Sorry me for destroying some illusions.
Hi Volker, I hope that you did not use the multiprocessor version of crafty on your 2 cpu machine ?I'm just trying to build a _weak_ book for Crafty. Time control is game in 5. I'm using Comet_B21 as opponent. Results so far:
No. Name Win Draw Loss Unf. Score Games %
------------------------------------------------------------
1 Crafty1710_weak +54 =15 -14 *0 61.5 83 74.1%
2 Comet_B21 +14 =15 -54 *0 21.5 83 25.9%
Total Games: 83
White Wins: 40 (48.2%)
Black Wins: 28 (33.7%)
Draws: 15 (18.1%)
Unfinished: 0 (0.0%)
System is 2*520 MHz, Ponder on, all 3, 4 and some 5 men tablebases.
Sorry me for destroying some illusions.
Volker
Hi Uli!Hi Volker, I hope that you did not use the multiprocessor version of crafty on your 2 cpu machine ?
This would probably distort the result, because the SMP engine would get one cpu 100% and the other one 50%. At least I guess so.
Uli
1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nxf7The cochrane is a opening gambit? Never heard of it..All of the gambits are still im the book, however with far decreased weights. >Recently, in a tourney I had to observe Comet playing the Cochrane against a >strong computer. I do not want to see this happen too often.
BTW, according to my statistics, crafty is clearly superior.
In Blitz? Perhaps, but I think CometB20-B21 is a lot closer than before..Comet also seems to be in the opening book 1-2 plies deeper than Crafty in most lines, I'm not sure if it's due to crafty's learning function kicking in early where due to losses it searches for some other move or something else..
[Event "?"]The cochrane is a opening gambit? Never heard of it..All of the gambits are still im the book, however with far decreased weights. >Recently, in a tourney I had to observe Comet playing the Cochrane against a >strong computer. I do not want to see this happen too often.
BTW, according to my statistics, crafty is clearly superior.
In Blitz? Perhaps, but I think CometB20-B21 is a lot closer than before..Comet also seems to be in the opening book 1-2 plies deeper than Crafty in most lines, I'm not sure if it's due to crafty's learning function kicking in early where due to losses it searches for some other move or something else..
Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests