Moderator: Andres Valverde
Kirill Kryukov wrote:Hi all,
More people joined the project - I recieved some new links, and many people are joining by downloading the files and keep them shared. To my surprise, most of 5-men bases were already downloaded at least once from me, kppkp is particularly popular (downloaded at least 6 times from me)
I added smiley faces to the index page, that mark online status of the particular tablebase. Now you can easily see what files are online and what files can't be downloaded at the moment. If you have the file which is marked by sad face, it would be great if you could share it again. (And drop me a message so that I'll mark it with happy face again)
I'd like to welcome more people to join this project, share the tablebases and send me links and status updates. If you just want to download it is fine too, but please keep the files shared at least for a while after you get them. If you have any questions about sharing files with eMule, please ask here or by email.
Happy sharing,
Best,
Kirill
Roger Brown wrote:I am not against the worthy goals of the project as outlined here and elsewhere but I would strongly urge that any (general ?) questions about sharing files with emule NOT be asked here but by way of private e-mail.
Thomas Mayer wrote:in my opinion this is a really fantastic idea, especially because currently no 6-men are available from Hyatt. My own collection is so far very small, but made them available now also via Emule. So far it's just KBBB-KP, KBB-KBB, KBB-KBN, KBB-KNN, KBN-KBN, KBN-KNN, KNN-KNN, KQB-KBB, KRR-KRB, KRR-KRR
Once I just downloaded them for testing issues, but with the possibility to get them with emule now I will try to add some more. Great idea, once more. For such things file-sharing is definitely perfect.
Richard Pijl wrote:Meanwhile, I'm sharing about 500Gb 6-men EGTB's with an upload capacity of 50kByte/s which is usually fully utilized. All complete files that I have are already copied to at least one other participant [...]
Dieter B?r?ner wrote:Hi Richard, are you sure all the data has been utilized at least once? My fast calculation: 500 Gb with 50 kb/s need 10 million seconds. One day has a bit less than 100 thousand seconds. So, when each file is downloaded exactly once, and the upload bandwith is used at full capacity all the time, this would need over 100 days.
Dieter B?r?ner wrote:I do not know emule, and I thought about sharing some TBs. I got some doubt, if it would work with my upload speed. I think I have 128 kbits/s. For 800 MB files (a typical size of 6-men TBs), and say 2 downloads at a time, this would take over a day.
Dieter B?r?ner wrote:My connection to the internet is closed at least once every 24 hours. Wouldn't this cause too many problems?
Dieter B?r?ner wrote:Richard Pijl wrote:Meanwhile, I'm sharing about 500Gb 6-men EGTB's with an upload capacity of 50kByte/s which is usually fully utilized. All complete files that I have are already copied to at least one other participant [...]
Hi Richard, are you sure all the data has been utilized at least once? My fast calculation: 500 Gb with 50 kb/s need 10 million seconds. One day has a bit less than 100 thousand seconds. So, when each file is downloaded exactly once, and the upload bandwith is used at full capacity all the time, this would need over 100 days.
I do not know emule, and I thought about sharing some TBs. I got some doubt, if it would work with my upload speed. I think I have 128 kbits/s. For 800 MB files (a typical size of 6-men TBs), and say 2 downloads at a time, this would take over a day. My connection to the internet is closed at least once every 24 hours. Wouldn't this cause too many problems?
Cheers,
Dieter
I remember you once posted a list of most common 6-men-endings which actually occured in human-human games. It appeared that KRPPKR was even more common than i.e. KPPKPP or KRPKRP. Do you still have that list or any other "priorisation" of which 6-men-endings one should have?
Richard Pijl wrote:
When selecting the subset you want to download, remember what EGTB's can do for you. It is of relatively little use to download outright won endgames like kqrpkn which can be handled pretty well by engines. The same is true for drawish endgames like krnkbn. IMO the most interesting EGTB's are those that have a slight advantage for one side, where the question is whether the position is won or not. It not only helps playing the position when it occurs, but more importantly, it helps (to avoid) trading down to (drawn or) won endings when you're ahead in material. So endings like krppkr, kpppkr etc. Same is true for endings that are very hard to search through, like uneven material endings with queens, e.g. krbpkq (warning, this is a very big one!) or krppkq.
Richard.
Joachim Rang wrote:I remember you once posted a list of most common 6-men-endings which actually occured in human-human games. It appeared that KRPPKR was even more common than i.e. KPPKPP or KRPKRP. Do you still have that list or any other "priorisation" of which 6-men-endings one should have?
Joachim Rang wrote:Perhaps Kirill has ambitions to expand his page with such information?
Arnon Yogev wrote:Hi all,
I was wondering .. What is the exact string I should type when looking for the EGTB's ?
I have tried
"EGTB"
"Tablebases"
"Nalimov"
And even specific files such as .. KRPKRP KBN-KNN and so on..
Still none of them returned any results whatsoever.
Am I missing anything or doing something the wrong way?
Thanks, Arnon.
Return to Winboard and related Topics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests