- Code: Select all
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Ruffian_101 : 2938 154 390 7 92.9 % 2493 14.3 %
2 Zappa : 2824 320 686 6 83.3 % 2545 0.0 %
3 Gandalf60 : 2774 255 317 9 72.2 % 2608 11.1 %
4 AnMon_550 : 2747 325 198 8 56.2 % 2704 37.5 %
5 Delfi : 2733 266 249 9 66.7 % 2612 22.2 %
6 List512 : 2722 66 161 56 80.4 % 2478 7.1 %
7 Aristarch 4.50: 2691 69 129 55 77.3 % 2478 16.4 %
8 Fruit_20 : 2654 70 134 56 74.1 % 2472 8.9 %
9 Glc3034 : 2651 278 284 9 61.1 % 2572 11.1 %
10 Slow : 2646 207 207 8 50.0 % 2646 50.0 %
11 Glaurung : 2608 229 229 9 50.0 % 2608 33.3 %
12 Slowchess : 2546 87 91 56 57.1 % 2496 14.3 %
13 Crafty-1919 : 2539 134 278 9 38.9 % 2617 55.6 %
14 Booot441 : 2486 323 296 8 31.2 % 2623 12.5 %
15 Dragon_46 : 2454 272 245 9 22.2 % 2671 22.2 %
16 Ges : 2405 117 78 56 34.8 % 2514 5.4 %
17 Danasah1 : 2290 564 262 8 12.5 % 2628 0.0 %
18 Wingx : 2192 252 68 47 12.8 % 2525 0.0 %
19 SimonBB : 1999 421 31 55 3.6 % 2568 0.0 %
Not enough data to draw firm conclusions, but some interesting things...
Zappa did have a strong performance (not many games, but WOW -- for those it did complete), and GES 1.35 worked out to within 50 Elo of Dragon 46. That's a pretty big jump.
Slow is the blitz version of Slowchess and Slowchess is the source code version I compiled.
GES managed draws with Slowchess, Fruit, and Glaurung!
- Code: Select all
16 Ges : 2405 56 (+ 18,= 3,- 35), 34.8 %
Slow : 1 (+ 0,= 0,- 1), 0.0 %
Slowchess : 9 (+ 0,= 2,- 7), 11.1 %
SimonBB : 9 (+ 9,= 0,- 0), 100.0 %
Ruffian_101 : 1 (+ 0,= 0,- 1), 0.0 %
Aristarch 4.50 : 8 (+ 0,= 0,- 8), 0.0 %
List512 : 9 (+ 0,= 0,- 9), 0.0 %
Glc3034 : 1 (+ 0,= 0,- 1), 0.0 %
Glaurung : 1 (+ 1,= 0,- 0), 100.0 %
Gandalf60 : 1 (+ 0,= 0,- 1), 0.0 %
Fruit_20 : 8 (+ 0,= 1,- 7), 6.2 %
Wingx : 8 (+ 8,= 0,- 0), 100.0 %